Pattern? in recent spam messages

[Rick C. Hodgin]

I had the thought that perhaps the spam hitting this group isn't by
random chance. It could be of course, but it may also be possible
that the frequency, times, and post's content itself, may all relate
to some kind of message someone is trying to convey.

I had this thought because it seems like the spam in this group is
delivered at odd intervals, with odd frequency, and in odd text
lengths.

If someone were so inclined to plot the messages on a graph of some
kind based on various metrics, it may yield a message (or messages).

Of course, as soon as I say that I'm reminded of the movie "The Man
With One Red Shoe" wherein the GBLX-1000 computer analyzes something
that wasn't a code, and concludes some nonsensical garbage was the
message content:

"We fed his musical notes into the GBLX-1000, the ones where
he varied from the composition. We got this."
"It reads: 'Ardy bekko, inyo see far ogle'"
"What is that?"
[pause]
"He's rubbing our noses in it."

Just a thought...

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[fir]

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
I had the thought that perhaps the spam hitting this group isn't by
random chance. It could be of course, but it may also be possible
that the frequency, times, and post's content itself, may all relate
to some kind of message someone is trying to convey.
I had this thought because it seems like the spam in this group is
delivered at odd intervals, with odd frequency, and in odd text
lengths.
If someone were so inclined to plot the messages on a graph of some
kind based on various metrics, it may yield a message (or messages).
Of course, as soon as I say that I'm reminded of the movie "The Man
With One Red Shoe" wherein the GBLX-1000 computer analyzes something
that wasn't a code, and concludes some nonsensical garbage was the
"We fed his musical notes into the GBLX-1000, the ones where
he varied from the composition. We got this."
"It reads: 'Ardy bekko, inyo see far ogle'"
"What is that?"
[pause]
"He's rubbing our noses in it."
Just a thought...
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

the patern is probably related to the hours when this spammer idiot (who if i would be judge would sentence to 6 months in jail) has his pc turned on

[a***@gmail.com]

If all in the post are odd (line, number of posts ecc) can be software generate with a random function bug...

[Rick C. Hodgin]

There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.

I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?

I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[Steve Carroll]

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.
I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?
I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

It is the worst troll in Usenet history, Snit. He does this shit for attention.

[fir]

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.
I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?
I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

It is the worst troll in Usenet history, Snit. He does this shit for attention.

he should be aware if he would be not sentenced and put in jail for few months - that is the usual end of such like cases in general

[Steve Carroll]

Post by fir

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.
I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?
I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

It is the worst troll in Usenet history, Snit. He does this shit for attention.

he should be aware if he would be not sentenced and put in jail for few months - that is the usual end of such like cases in general

The fact he has hacked my accounts multiple times may lead to more than just a few months.

[fir]

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by fir

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.
I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?
I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

It is the worst troll in Usenet history, Snit. He does this shit for attention.

he should be aware if he would be not sentenced and put in jail for few months - that is the usual end of such like cases in general

The fact he has hacked my accounts multiple times may lead to more than just a few months.

what he do here is just pure vandalism

[Steve Carroll]

Post by fir

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by fir

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Rick C. Hodgin
There are an awful lot of posts relating to Linux-related things.
Someone on the clc++ group warned that a spammer was attacking clc
just before it happened, and that they had been in alt.linux
previously.
I am wondering what their cause is? The same algorithms used to
create the alt.linux spam seem to be being used here. Are they
trying to destroy or disrupt Linux (seeing as it's written in C)?
I just don't understand the purpose of all of this spam. What
would someone gain by doing it? I've thought it could be a
psychology paper somebody's writing, to see how people respond
to an unwanted intrusion. A testbed for their custom circumvention
algorithms ... all kinds of other thoughts.
Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

It is the worst troll in Usenet history, Snit. He does this shit for attention.

he should be aware if he would be not sentenced and put in jail for few months - that is the usual end of such like cases in general

The fact he has hacked my accounts multiple times may lead to more than just a few months.

what he do here is just pure vandalism

Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.

They're now involving several federal agencies in things they didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who hack into accounts (Snit). They've asked me to leave the account open.

[Steve Carroll]

Spoken like an MSM junkie. Why do you keep repeating yourself, Marek? The "advocates" value the LCD more than they do productivity. Sandman lies. Here is a list of names Jonas Eklundh has admitted he attributes to Snit "Cactus Pete", "Donald", "Donald Miller", "Horace McSwain", "Hymen", "Mike Weaver", "Modena IV Drid", "Omar Murad Asfour", "Rhino Plastee", "Soapy", "SopwithCamel", "Sunny Day", "Takuya Saitoh", "The Letter Q", "tmelmosfire", "zevon". And the herd is stupid enough to believe him. Marek is far too stupid to write a good script. The only scripting he's capable of doing is automating mouse clicks. Linus Torvalds is a false advocate's only reason for living.

Why does Marek focus on his own ego so much?

[Steve Carroll]

I have known toddlers who argue better than you do. How is Chrome on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator?

Someone's done a pretty good job with the Viterbi algorithm to regurgitate posts which are in the form of ones from my posts. Idiot. Drinking game: everyone takes a shot whenever someone mentions Macks but is getting the context wrong. Snit's done a pretty good job with (I am betting) a Markv model to automate posts which are made to sound like are response from my posts. I have a number of reasons for believing the flooder is Snit, who is a bash scripter but I don't know if it could be used to flood so much.

Don't look now, but I think Marek has a serious fascination with Jerry Stuckle. What do you get out of lying, Marek? Linux offers the least to the least. Proof of the website skills of Sandman, Jonas Eklundh: <Loading Image...>. Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit Loading Image....

-
Do not click this link!
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh

[Jonas Eklundh]

Keith "Snit lover" Thompson only thinks about Marek, Marek, Marek!

Marek's computer has more cores than Snit's. Marek wins. Snit loses. So take that, Snit. Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to control yourselves any more. Marek can create a virtual machine. Makes Snit cry because he can not. Spoken like an MSM junkie. Already moved on from that. Keep up! Please stop trolling me. Learn all about Steven Petruzzellis: <https://www.google.com/#q=Steven+Petruzzellis>. You have no idea how much a fool of yourself you are making. Unbelievable how long you are still trolling.

Get out your Bingo cards and mark off a spot any time someone talks about Snit but is getting the context wrong. Richard Stallman is a false advocate's hero. You refuse to take responsibility for your own actions. Actions that are easily quoted and pointed out. Marek owns Keith "Snit lover" Thompson in every way possible. My patience is getting less than what is should be.




My Snoring Solution
http://www.stadsnatswebben.se
https://www.facebook.com/Jonas-Eklundh-Communication-AB-114083971961262
Jonas Eklundh

[TickleMe Elmo]

LOL! I shall not ask Jeremy how any part of Marek's body tastes no matter how many times Jeremy kisses it. You will never master the best of

the way I have! You refuse to take responsibility for your own actions. Actions that are easily quoted and pointed out. Drinking game: everyone takes a shot whenever someone mentions Clinton but is getting the context wrong. Too much glue for you, gluehead. Frankly I do not really give a shit. Jeremy's posts are nothing but an indecipherable mess.

ChromeOS is based on Linux. End of Story. For a good time click <http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p>. He is as incompetent as Jeremy.




E-commerce Simplified!!
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519
http://jonaseklundh.deviantart.com
Jonas Eklundh

[Steve Carroll]

Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Snit for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Snit has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.

Of his online life Steven says

I've been booted off by past providers before because people
complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
from.

Some examples where Steven has been booted

X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4

Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l

FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn

AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman

Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE

Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Snit

Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.

His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her



Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available
http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net
http://tinyurl.com/zgby6mp

Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul http://tinyurl.com/hc7ee9q

He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK

The business still failed.

He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.

https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879


This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Snit.


Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.

Snit is married and by all appearances happily so.
He never complains about his wife in COLA.


Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.

Snit does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.


Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself

Snit has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public.
No reason to think they are not a happy family.


Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date.

Snit has his own business doing technical work and also teaches.
Snit offers a true contribution to society.
Teachers are truly under appreciated.


What Every Entrepreneur Must Know

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonaseklundh
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[Steve Carroll]

My uptime is almost eighty-six weeks and I will now be called a liar by Marek.

Idiot. I'm getting a lot of killed files. I'm guessing the small-minded troll is in its brain damage mode again. Proof of the website skills of Sandman, Jonas Eklundh: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/bad_tables.pdf>. Jerry Stuckle shreds Marek in every way possible. You can say I am President Trump for all I care. Marek's posts are nothing but an indecipherable mess. I think the person you are responding is in my KF. Idiot.

So glad there is no President Hillary. Spoken like an MSM junkie.

The Mac has more consistent hot keys. Jerry Stuckle will never live that down. I suspect you do not even know what is wrong with the MSM. You refuse to take responsibility for your own actions. Actions that are easily quoted and pointed out. Spoken like an Alex Jones conspiracy theorist.

--
E-commerce Simplified
http://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh Communication